Citat: “Overall scores on the DDCL indicated that the false statement was rated as significantly more deceptive than the true statement. The DDCL possessed good reliability, and a series of factor analyses provided strong support for the construct validity of the measure. The 7 psychometrically strongest items from the DDCL included variables assessing the extent…
Citat:“Psychopaths (relative to their counterparts) included more rational cause‐and‐effect descriptors (e.g., ‘because’, ‘since’), focused on material needs (food, drink, money), and contained fewer references to social needs (family, religion/spirituality). Psychopaths’ speech contained a higher frequency of disfluencies (‘uh’, ‘um’) indicating that describing such a powerful, ‘emotional’ event to another person was relatively difficult for them.…
Citat: “The current study compared college students’ retrospective self-reports of peri- and posttraumatic responses of fear, shame, guilt, anger, and sadness among four types of traumatic events: sexual assault, physical assault, transportation accident, and illness/injury. Overall emotional responding was generally high for all trauma types, and for those in the sexual assault group, emotion increased…
Link til studie: http://web.uvic.ca/psyc/bavelas/1998theoret.pdf
Citat: “A logistic regression model was developed to predict veracity or deception using the six predictors from the research questions. The resulting model correctly classified the examined narratives at an 82.1% classification level. The most significant predictor of veracity was unique sensory details; the most significant predictor of deception was relative length of the prologue…
Citat:“»Forsøget bekræfter en vigtigt pointe inden for kognition. Sammen med anden eksisterede forskning viser det, at læseretningen fra venstre mod højre og sætningens grammatik former vores indre billeder. Vi bliver på den måde hjernevaskede af vores skriftsprog,« siger Mikkel Walentin, der er kognitionsforsker ved Aarhus Universitet.” Link til artikel: https://videnskab.dk/kultur-samfund/grammatik-og-ordstilling-paavirker-hvad-vi-ser-for-os
Citat:“Laboratory-based detecting deception research suggests that truthful statements differ from those of deceptive statements. This nonlaboratory study tested whether forensic statement analysis (FSA) methods would distinguish genuine from false eyewitness accounts about exposure to a highly stressful event.” “The classification accuracy using FSA techniques was 82%. FSA methods may be effective in real-world circumstances and…